<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.ooda.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Argument_from_Silence_in_Bayesian_Historiography</id>
	<title>Argument from Silence in Bayesian Historiography - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.ooda.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Argument_from_Silence_in_Bayesian_Historiography"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ooda.wiki/index.php?title=Argument_from_Silence_in_Bayesian_Historiography&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-08T16:37:37Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.ooda.wiki/index.php?title=Argument_from_Silence_in_Bayesian_Historiography&amp;diff=1330&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>AdminIsidore: Created page with &quot;Argument from silence infers hypotheses from absent expected evidence, formalized Bayesially as low posterior when P(E|H) high but E unobserved. In historiography, it counters binary fallacies by quantifying silence strength.  === Definition === If P(E|H) ≈1 (evidence expected if true) and E absent, then P(H|E) ↓ via likelihood ratio L = P(E|H)/P(E|¬H) &lt;&lt;1. Silence valid when source comprehensive and unbiased.  Priors: Baseline mention rates from cohorts (e.g., 0.7...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ooda.wiki/index.php?title=Argument_from_Silence_in_Bayesian_Historiography&amp;diff=1330&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-11-19T18:07:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Argument from silence infers hypotheses from absent expected evidence, formalized Bayesially as low posterior when P(E|H) high but E unobserved. In historiography, it counters binary fallacies by quantifying silence strength.  === Definition === If P(E|H) ≈1 (evidence expected if true) and E absent, then P(H|E) ↓ via likelihood ratio L = P(E|H)/P(E|¬H) &amp;lt;&amp;lt;1. Silence valid when source comprehensive and unbiased.  Priors: Baseline mention rates from cohorts (e.g., 0.7...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Argument from silence infers hypotheses from absent expected evidence, formalized Bayesially as low posterior when P(E|H) high but E unobserved. In historiography, it counters binary fallacies by quantifying silence strength.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition ===&lt;br /&gt;
If P(E|H) ≈1 (evidence expected if true) and E absent, then P(H|E) ↓ via likelihood ratio L = P(E|H)/P(E|¬H) &amp;lt;&amp;lt;1. Silence valid when source comprehensive and unbiased.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Priors: Baseline mention rates from cohorts (e.g., 0.7 for Quaker arrests in Great Book of Sufferings).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Workflow ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Establish P(E|H): From source scope (e.g., Penn diaries exhaustive for Keithians).&lt;br /&gt;
Compute L; update posterior.&lt;br /&gt;
Adjust for biases (e.g., destruction multiplier).&lt;br /&gt;
Threshold: L&amp;lt;0.1 demotes to uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Applications ===&lt;br /&gt;
Debunk myths (e.g., no Eastern van Helmont mentions in Sendivogius parallels → P&amp;lt;0.2). Correlate with [[Esoteric Maneuverability Score|EMS]] for evasion. Historiographic audits: Silence in Hartlib → probable Italy 1650s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Example: Van Helmont ===&lt;br /&gt;
Quaker crackdowns 1680s: High P(mention|H) in Sufferings if London-resident; absence → mobility/immunity, P(static London) from 0.7 to 0.4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Concepts ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Methodological Foundations for Probabilistic Geo-Temporal Timelines]], [[Network Gravity in Intellectual History]], [[Peripatetic Esotericism]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AdminIsidore</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>